Solving Syria Requires Separating Myth From Reality
To the West, Syria is a tale of two tales.
To the West, Syria is a tale of two tales.
Anne-Marie Slaughter, former Director of Policy Planning for the Obama administration, advises bypassing the U.N. Security Council and intervening in Syria.
Hawks are using the death of journalists such as Marie Colvin to further the cause of military aid to Syria’s opposition.
Libya is not a convincing precedent for intervening in Syria by arming opposition groups.
Intelligence confirms that Iran is not developing nuclear weapons – which leads to speculation that the sabre-rattling is because Israel wants to remain the sole regional nuclear hegemon.
Nir Rosen’s reporting from Syria for alJazeera reveals the character of the opposition.
Giving military aid to either side of the Syrian conflict will make civil war more likely and prevent the citizens of Syria from achieving any semblance of justice and freedom.
Al Qaeda never met a conflict it didn’t like.
The Russian and Chinese veto of the moderate and reasonable UN Security Council resolution was unconscionable, but the United States may have its own hypocrisy to thank.
When we focus our analysis on personalities like Assad in Syria or Kim Jong Un in North Korea, we succumb to our own personality cult.
Iran’s support for Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad further mocks the Islamic Revolution.
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime must step down immediately–without Western military intervention.
The Syrian opposition can’t seem to decide whether or not it wants the West to intercede.
Turkey and Syria are no longer BFFs.
The U.S. will likely leave Syria to the Arab League and avoid pressing SCAF over transparency in the upcoming Egyptian elections.