Obama’s Speech on Libya: Leaving Too Many Questions Unanswered
The attention to military engagement in Libya drowns out the call for negotiations, for accountability, and even for a ceasefire.
The attention to military engagement in Libya drowns out the call for negotiations, for accountability, and even for a ceasefire.
Many on the left favor the Libya intervention.
Libyan protesters asked for help, but the military attacks they’re getting may actually create a whole new set of problems that could last a very long time.
Ed Schultz criticized the GOP because it “steamrolled America into two wars” but defends President Obama for attacking Libya.
Can an airstrike ever be humanitarian?
It may be a symptom of a perceived need on the part of the U.S. to keep control of energy from China.
Some arguments against intervention deserve serious consideration. The “hypocrisy” mantra, however, is not one of them.
The dreaded “revolutionary justice” has already reared its ugly head in Libya.
Samantha Power is uniquely equipped to interpret the words of Gaddafi and his followers.
CNN and other media outlets are missing the real story about foreign laborers in Libya and elsewhere in the Middle East.
Despite its official UN-granted legality, the credibility of Western military action in Libya is rapidly dwindling.
Phyllis Bennis tells GRITtv the story behind the intervention in Libya, who the players are, why this matters, and whether we’re in this one too for the long haul.
At the moment, stopping the unpredictable Gaddafi is seen as the best option by Arab leaders.
Will military intervention dislodge Gaddafi or lead to yet another quagmire?