To Whatever Extent Libya Is a Victory, It’s a Defeat for Nuclear Nonproliferation
As with Saddam Hussein and his regime in Iraq, states may conclude that the fate of Qaddafi was sealed the day he gave up nuclear weapons.
As with Saddam Hussein and his regime in Iraq, states may conclude that the fate of Qaddafi was sealed the day he gave up nuclear weapons.
As with the debt-ceiling deal, there’s no end to the largesse that the Obama administration bestows on the nuclear weapons program.
Deterrence has long outlived its usefulness.
Prime Minister Gillard’s call for the abolition of nuclear weapons had its origins in a powerhouse international 2008 commission.
Can nuclear nonproliferation and disarmament treaties endure if states fail to resolve the issues between them?
New START’s token disarmament is canceled out by the vast amount of money the administration throws at the nuclear-weapons industry.
Whether or not nuclear weapons are ever abolished, mankind will still know how to make them, right?
How about shifting the $1 trillion per decade the world spends on nuclear weapons to more important priorities?
Conservatives and progressives are completely at odds over how to reduce the nuclear threat.
If we get to Global Zero, how do we stay there?
Withholding their nuclear weapons isn’t the only way states retard the progress of disarmament.
Imagine disarmament and nonproliferation talks in which states with more nuclear weapons make other states pay a price for having fewer.
The United States and 13 NATO allies are actively seeking to remove U.S. nuclear weapons from Europe.
Assorted emissions and discharges from the world of nuclear weapons.
Targeting missile defense for elimination can come back to haunt disarmament advocates.