Phyllis Bennis' free newsletter (delivered 1-2x a month).

" />
EVERY TWO WEEKS
   Please leave this field empty
Institute for Policy Studies
RSS Feeds
  • January 27, 2013

    The Real News Network

    Visit the publisher's website

    BENNIS: Well, it certainly is nothing new and different for Palestinians to talk about the need for Israeli accountability for potential violations of international law and war crimes. This has been on the agenda for some years now. And the question has been: when can Palestine become a member of the International Criminal Court so it can begin the process of trying to hold Israel accountable for those war crimes, for those violations?

    . . . DESVARIEUX: Okay. What do you make of the timing of this announcement, especially in the wake of Israeli election?

    BENNIS: Well, I think that the timing was driven less by the elections . . . But it was kind of putting that new government, the potential new government that will still be led by Bibi Netanyahu, on notice of their intention to go to the International Criminal Court.

    I think the real motivating factor in terms of timing had to do with the growing crisis in the West Bank in particular and the fact that the PA had lost so much of its authority and credibility in recent years but had reclaimed much of that through the UN initiative last fall . . . And one of the real reasons why was precisely this question of a way to bring Israel to account, to hold Israel to account in the International Criminal Court. So this is a way of maintaining that credibility by answering the demand of Palestinians themselves to move forward, to hold Israel accountable in a way that it's never been held accountable before.

  • January 18, 2013

    The Real News Network

    Visit the publisher's website

    BENNIS: This is coming on to the second anniversary now of the Arab Spring. And I'm one of maybe only a few left that are still calling it a spring, because I think that despite the horrors that are right now facing people, . . . what we're seeing . . . throughout the Arab world, has been a just incredible rising of peoples claiming their citizenship in a way that they just have never done for the last 40 or 50 years.

    . . . [Granted,] In Syria . . . it's a very messy situation in which . . . the original opposition movement, [those secular, democratic, committed to nonviolence], Their voices have been silenced by the sound of the guns.

    . . . [And] Libya, of course, remains completely chaotic, without a viable government that's capable of providing security for the people of Libya . . .

    [But:] the optimism has to come back when we look at Egypt. [Despite] . . . significant losses for the secular and democratic components of the opposition forces . . . I still think that what we're seeing in Egypt is a very exciting moment that over the long and even medium term is going to transform that country into a place where people claim their rights as citizens of their country and not subjects of a U.S.-backed dictatorship, as they were for so many years.

    . . . I think that the secular opposition, the Christian opposition, the Muslim opposition, who just doesn't want as big a role for religion in the government, all . . . are coming together. And I think they're showing themselves to be an important player in society.

  • December 30, 2012

    The Real News Network

    Visit the publisher's website

    JAY: Now, it's kind of interesting that Hagel was even floated [as next Secretary of Defense]. It does suggest that this is where Obama's thinking is. . . . Obama sort of has been more realistic that U.S. policy has to take into account Iran as a serious player in the region and you'd better deal with them. 

    . . . Is the floating of Hagel an actual attempt to say this next term, this is going to be—we're going to get serious now, 'cause otherwise why do it?

    BENNIS: It is certainly possible that it's an indication and is being floated by the Obama White House precisely to assess where is public opinion on these questions of war with Iran, speeding up the withdrawal from Afghanistan, perhaps, but I don't think we know that. . . what we know for sure is that the far-right elements in the Republican Party, in the Israel lobby, are so much against him that the need to challenge that opposition, if you will, becomes one of the most important points.

    JAY: . . . my fear about the Hagel balloon is that what he's there for, he's there deliberately as a balloon that can burst, 'cause Obama actually wants somebody else, but if he can get Hagel floated and then throw him under the bus, it's going to be hard for the Republicans to go after the second person.

    BENNIS: . . . of [the] not-great choices, Chuck Hagel emerges as probably the best there is, and in the context where he's being attacked so viciously by these powerful right-wing elements in the pro-Israel lobby and among the neocons. The idea that President Obama might actually cave in to that pressure would be a terrible thing to watch.

    . . . the fact that they were willing to throw [Susan Rice] under the bus is not a good sign. It ended up, I think, making President Obama himself look quite weak. He didn't fight for his candidate. He didn't fight for who he wants to be the member of his cabinet. If he does the same thing with Chuck Hagel, I think it will weaken him even further.

  • December 13, 2012

    Daytona Times

    Visit the publisher's website

    We, as African-Americans, simply could not remain silent when word broke of the Israeli bombings of Gaza. Along with Cornel West and others, we circulated a petition condemning the aggression and demanding an end to the occupation.

    While most of the mainstream media immediately jumped to the defense of Israel, the African-American political establishment remained silent about the entire episode.

    We cannot cede our voices on foreign policy to others. African-Americans have a moral and economic stake in the outcome of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The United States sends 8.5 million tax dollars a day to Israel. Both former U.S. President Jimmy Carter and past South African President Nelson Mandela, among others, compare the occupation of Palestine with South African apartheid.

  • November 30, 2012

    Truthout

    Visit the publisher's website

    The international sort of institutional importance is not that it's going to change anything about the Palestinians' presence at the UN. They still will not be members of the UN and they still will not be able to vote or to introduce resolutions. . . .

    The significance of that is that it gives them the opportunity to use that status of a state to do other things, most notably, to sign the Rome Treaty creating the International Criminal Court, and thus become a member of the International Criminal Court. . . .  there's at least the possibility that they could initiate an effort to bring criminal charges against Israeli officials, military and political, and potentially even U.S. officials . . . [T]hat's a long way off, it's not going to happen anytime soon, but it's an interesting step towards that.

    The other significant reason has nothing to do with the UN and everything to do with internal Palestinian politics . . . the stature of the Palestinian Authority, led by Mahmoud Abbas, has been diminishing in recent years . . . This was about maintaining whatever shreds of credibility he's got left.

  • November 21, 2012

    The Real News Network

    Visit the publisher's website

    PHYLLIS BENNIS: I was struck by the statement a day or two ago by the Israeli defense minister, Ehud Barak, when he talked about the role of the United States in all this. And he said, and I quote, "This effort could not have been concluded without the generous and consistent support of the American administration, led by President Obama," end quote. That's a rather extraordinary thing to say, because on the one hand, it sounds like an introduction to a speaker or something like that. On the other hand, it's an admission of complicity, that he's saying the U.S. made it all possible.

    . . . The reality is, right now, Paul, what we're dealing with is a scenario where the U.S. ordinarily is prepared to call the shots in the Middle East. But suddenly there's a new Middle East. The U.S. doesn't have the same options that it once did. . . . ironically, right now the countries that the U.S. most needs to act as U.S. interlocutors in the region, Turkey and Egypt, are arguably Hamas's closest allies. . . . So what does this say about the normalization of Hamas in the region? It's a very different scenario.

  • November 21, 2012

    Between The Lines

    Visit the publisher's website

    PHYLLIS BENNIS: History starts with when you start the clock. You could start . . . with the assassination of Ahmed Jaabari . . . after a fragile ceasefire. . . . You could start at any point.

    All of this takes place in the context of occupation . . . which in international law means there is external control by a foreign government, not x number of soldiers on the ground. . . .

    Gaza remains occupied. It's a different form of occupation, it's in the form of a siege rather than in the form of a physical soldier occupation, but it's occupation nonetheless, and unless we understand it in that context, it's going to happen again -- even when we get a ceasefire.

    PHYLLIS BENNIS: South African anti-apartheid activists describe Gaza . . . as an open-air prison. And it raises the question of whether it's even a separate war crime, one that hasn't ever been codified in international law, to deny people the right to seek refuge. When you deny people the right to flee, and then they're killed, it's almost like another kind of war crime that needs to be codified and people held accountable for that as well.

  • November 19, 2012

    The Real News Network

    Visit the publisher's website

    DESVARIEUX: So, Phyllis, tell us: what's your take on what just happened recently in Gaza?

    BENNIS: Well, I think that what we're looking at is a huge escalation on the part of Israel against Gaza, very reminiscent in a number of ways of the Operation Cast Lead of 2008, 2009, also beginning shortly after the election-the first election, that time-of President Obama, and before the inauguration in both cases.

    In this case we saw this huge escalation after a two-day ceasefire negotiated by Egypt had largely held. Israel responded to that ceasefire by carrying out an assassination of the Gazan leader, Ahmed Jaabari, who among other things was indeed a leader of the military wing of Hamas, but in recent years had also been the top negotiator with Israel for, among other things, the prisoner exchange . . .

    On the other hand, we're seeing a major question of how we decide who's responding to whom. History, you know, Jessica, is determined by when you start the clock. And in this case what we're hearing pretty much across the board from the mainstream media in the United States is Israel responded to Palestinian rockets, Palestinians have been firing rockets, Palestinians are firing rockets, and Israel responded.

  • November 16, 2012

    Russia Today TV

    Visit the publisher's website

    Timing of the recent escalation in tension between Israel and Gaza is not coincidental. It is a calculated move, Phyllis Bennis, director of the Institute for Policy Studies has told RT.

    The Israelis launched their attack shortly after the US elections and shortly before the US was about to swear in a president at the inauguration in January and just before Israeli elections were scheduled as well. So there is no question that it has everything to do with Israeli politics,” she says.

    . . . On the political side we’re likely to see a much greater distancing between the Israeli and Egyptian governments. I don’t think as I said, we’re going to see the engagement of the Egyptian government directly militarily with Israel certainly, but some kind of reconsideration of the Camp David Accord and its terms are a likely follow up to the Egyptian decision to withdraw its ambassador from Tel Aviv, which it did just yesterday.

  • November 16, 2012

    Russia Today TV

    Visit the publisher's website

    Timing of the recent escalation in tension between Israel and Gaza is not coincidental. It is a calculated move, Phyllis Bennis, director of the Institute for Policy Studies has told RT.

    The Israelis launched their attack shortly after the US elections and shortly before the US was about to swear in a president at the inauguration in January and just before Israeli elections were scheduled as well. So there is no question that it has everything to do with Israeli politics,” she says.

Page Previous 123456 Next