Miriam Pemberton is a Research Fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies. She directs its Peace Economy Transitions Project which focuses on helping to build the foundations of a postwar economy at the federal, state and local levels. She co-chairs the Budget Priorities Working Group, the principal information-sharing collaboration of U.S. NGOs working on reducing Pentagon spending.
In addition to articles and opeds, her publications include two report series. “Military vs. Climate Security” compares federal spending on the two security domains, and argues for a shift of security resources toward mitigating climate change. “A Unified Security Budget for the United States” examined the balance of spending on military forces, homeland security and non-military foreign engagement and argues for a rebalanced security budget.
With William Hartung of the New America Foundation, she is co-editor of the book Lessons from Iraq: Avoiding the Next War (Paradigm Publishers, 2008). Formerly she was editor, researcher and finally director of the National Commission for Economic Conversion and Disarmament. She holds a Ph.D. from the University of Michigan.
Throwing money at the Pentagon while gutting other programs that protect Americans shouldn't make anyone feel safer.
The president says he'll protect our interests against the boondoggle weapons makers. Don't believe him.
If Congress gets out of the way.
The brass asked for a report on eliminating waste. When investigators found some, the military buried it.
As our climate crisis plays out in increased refugee flows and natural disasters, the government is still wasting money on ineffective, traditional military security.
Help us spread the word about our latest report, "Combat Vs. Climate: The Military and Climate Security Budgets Compared"
The Military and Climate Security Budgets Compared
IPS defense expert Miriam Pemberton explains that the United States military remains the most powerful on earth by far in this segment of Campaign for America's Future “Burning Issues” video series.
Hundreds of thousands of jobs are tied to the fortunes of Pentagon spending, but the People's Budget has the means to overcome this dependency.
Sanders would find plenty to get rid of in America's bloated defense budget.
The Obama administration's final Pentagon budget calls for quadrupling spending on efforts to counter Russia.
The next GOP debate could find even more substance by making candidates answer Paul’s question to the conservative movement.
As Congressional dysfunction seemed to be barreling us toward a government shutdown, comes the news of an 11th-hour deal, announced Monday at midnight.
We’re now getting another taste of what the ongoing assault on the federal government’s watchdog function is doing to all of us.
In his address to Congress, Pope Francis talked about causes of war.
Boosting the Pentagon's budget amounts to robbing domestic programs we desperately need.
For U.S. communities dependent on the same industries that have brought Russia to its knees, the time to start planning an economic transition is now.
As funding for military contracts shrinks, major defense contractors have started to edge their way into the business of implementing health care reform.
Lawmakers and military administrators are shifting baseline funding to the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) budget, which is exempt from mandatory cuts.
Defense-dependent communities need to start diversifying their economies now, before shifts in Pentagon spending leave them with few viable alternatives.