Investing in Our Future Act of 2011
February 11, 2011 · By Janet Redman
Climate change and the lack of health care services in developing countries are urgent and under-funded crises threatening the livelihoods and security of billions of people.
Even as Wall Street reaps record profits, the financial crisis continues to push millions of people around the world deeper into poverty while shrinking national budgets that provide social safety nets. The financial sector collects huge economic benefits from global currency trading. Speculation on currency continues unabated and largely untaxed, even though it can destabilize the real economy.
Legislation to establish a currency transaction levy (CTL) would amend the internal revenue code to establish a tiny tax on currency transactions to help pay down the national deficit and fund global health and climate change programs. Dealing with climate change in developing countries is estimated to cost around $500 billion per year. An additional $251 billion is needed between now and 2015 to strengthen health systems in low-income countries. A levy on currency transactions in the U.S. would raise billions of dollars each year – a significant step towards reaching our fair share of these urgent needs.
What is a Currency Transaction Levy?
This Act would create a 0.005% tax on all foreign currency exchange transactions – including derivatives – by large-scale traders in the U.S. (and U.S. subsidiaries of foreign companies) that trade more than $10,000 in currencies per year.
- Common Sense - Foreign currency exchange is the largest market in the world by volume – 50 times larger than all goods and services traded around the world each year. About $4 trillion worth of currency transactions took place each day in 2010. The foreign currency market is an anomaly in that it remains untaxed.
- New, additional, and predictable – Annual appropriations have not been sufficient to meet the scale of the need for global health and climate change. A CTL would help generate funds above and beyond existing commitments for climate and development – to help get us closer to matching the actual need of hundreds of billions of dollars per year.
- Equitable - A CTL wouldn’t hit middle class investors, small-scale traders, travelers or people sending remittances home. The Investing in Our Future Act includes an exemption for investors and businesses that trade less than $10,000 in foreign currencies per year. It would make Wall Street financiers - who crashed the global economy yet continue to make huge profits - help pay for global public goods.
- Smart Investment – Investment in international climate change adaptation and mitigation and global health is essential for reducing global poverty, promoting sustainable development, ensuring U.S. national security, and demonstrating our country’s moral and economic leadership.
How is the money collected?
Collection of a CTL is feasible, efficient and inexpensive to implement. To reduce the risk of non-payment, trading houses have made technological improvements that centralize and automate the way currency transactions are settled. These electronic systems capture trades whenever and wherever they take place by whoever makes the transaction. Currency traders depend on centralized systems to collect and verify their own transactions, so evasion of settlement and clearing houses is highly unlikely. At a rate of 0.005% a tax would be more costly to evade than pay.
What is the impact on the economy and the currency market?
More than 30 countries have either permanently or temporarily levied financial transaction taxes for the purpose of raising revenue over the last 25 years. In fact, the UK has had a “stamp duty” of 0.5% on stock transactions that raises the equivalent of 4% of their GDP each year, and the London Stock Exchange continues to thrive. Empirical evidence shows that a 0.005% is so small that it will have little effect on trading behavior – except to possibly reduce harmful currency speculation. While the U.S. can implement a CTL unilaterally, an internationally coordinated tax on all foreign exchange transactions will bring the most benefit to the global economy and public goods.
Where is money directed?
- Deficit Reduction – 40% of the revenue generated is directed back into federal coffers to help pay down our national deficit.
- Global Health - 25% of revenue generated is directed to fund the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB, and Malaria and other multilateral health funding mechanisms that meet stringent criteria for transparency, effectiveness, and engagement with contributing and implementing countries, civil society, and impacted communities.
- Climate Change - 25% of the revenue generated is directed to fund either the Green Climate Fund or the Adaptation Fund under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
- Child Care - 10% of revenue generated is directed to the Child Care Assistance Trust Fund to invest in the Child Care Development Block Grant to states to make child care more affordable and better quality.
 World Health Organization. “Constraints to Scaling Up Health Related MDGs: Costing and Financial Gap analysis.” WHO Report submitted to Working Group I of the High Level Taskforce on Innovative International Financing for Health Systems. 2009.
 Futures Magazine. “Daily Forex Turnover: $4 Trillion in 2010.” Novermber 30, 2010. Available at http://www.futuresmag.com/News/2010/11/Pages/Daily-forex-turnover-4-trillion-in-2010.aspx
 Dr. Rodney Schmidt, The North-South Institute. “The Financial Transactions Tax: Feasibility of taxing foreign exchange transactions.” May 2010.
 For more on the impacts of a CTL see David Hillman, Sony Kapoor and Stephen Spratt. “Taking the Next Step, Implementing a Currency Transaction Development Levy.” 2006; Rodney Schmidt. “The Currency Transaction Tax: Rate and Revenue Estimates.” October 2007; and Report of the UK Government All Party Parliamentary Group for Debt, Aid and Trade. “Meeting the Millennium Promise.” 2007.
 There are approximately 15.3 million children in the United States under the age of 6 who require childcare while their parents work, but the cost of childcare in most states is more than tuition at a four-year public university. Only one in seven children who are eligible for direct federal childcare assistance receives it.